"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way - in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only." - Charles Dickens (A Tale of Two Cities)
far journeys, after he had sacked Troy’s sacred citadel.
Many were they whose cities he saw, whose minds he learned of,
many the pains he suffered in his spirit on the wide sea,
struggling for his own life and the homecoming of his companions.
Even so he could not save his companions, hard though
he strove to; they were destroyed by their own wild recklessness,
fools, who devoured the oxen of Helios, the Sun God,and he took away the day of their homecoming.
Homer (The Odyssey)
And Bad Prologues:
Anything you or I have written to date.
Now, I have a prologue in my novel. I have debated, edited, and worried over this aspect of my work for some time now. I know that they are unpopular with agents and editors alike, so I hesitate to include the scene(s). I've gone back to my trove of books that I've read over the years to see how many of them have prologues. It amounts to approximately half the number that have made use of the device. Not exactly helpful, but at least I know it can be done.
This is not to say that you cannot have a prologue in your novel. However, given that most agents and publishers loathe the sight of such things, you will have to have a prologue on par with these venerable gentlemen to get past the inherent bias.
So, is this the "eye" dialect of formatting?